Advertisement
10 comments
@majorwvufan

I dont know why people are so negative in these comments. You can literally do the math. Yes, take a company match (Dave says that too), but $1 to roth is better than 1$ traditional.

@Fjjfuffnr244

What the? Every legit financial person, mathematician, and economist listening to this probably choked. I think Dave does a wonderful life coaching for people like him. But he is using financially and mathematically flawed logic to figure out what only HE seems to know and everyone else is wrong. I’m not gonna call him a moron, but jeez, this is an irresponsible statement at best. I know working teenagers who can spot where his logic went off the rails.

@someguy1994

Except a 401k is pre tax alongside company match, So assuming it's an even match, half of that money was contributed by your employer. so that's 48k Now you have to pay taxes on that $48k, so if it's say 20%, that's an additional roughly $10k lost, which puts you at only contributing about $38k instead of that $96k.

That's roughly 40% of that 2.5 million or 1 million left over. Acting like contributions to a standard 401k and a roth are equivalent at the point of contribution is disingenuous and another example of why Ramsey gives good basic advice about getting out of debt, but after that find someone else.

@123hkopm123

96k is never growing into 2.5 million with out massive inflation.

@hunterfg09

Isnt the idea of the traditional that you can put more money in earlier so it grows faster? So you end up putting in 225 a month instead of 200 post tax.

@unkownuser5809

Vote Kamala, so the government can tax your unrealized gains

@Snowman2394

Both have advantages. One is not better then the other