Kamala Harris has proven to be an enormous draw for campaign donors. But the size of a candidate’s war chest influences the outcome much less ( than it once did. Our correspondent meets asylum-seekers on a Dutch ship, investigating the new hard-right government’s tactics with migrants ( (09:39). And a survey of where the very scrapiest skyscrapers are going up ( (17:42).
Get a world of insights by subscribing to Economist Podcasts+ (. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page ( or watch our video ( explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy ( for more information.
source
@Parakeet-pk6dl
The question at 13:50 shows that you're not getting it. The presenter is throwing every type of migration and all the problems it brings with it together under the umbrella "migration". Asylum is not the same as Moroccan boys having an awful general attitude and making daily live less pleasant for everyone on the streets.
Geert Wilders has won because of the Trojan Horse that is migration from countries that despise the values of the country they're migrating to. It kills your education system, general believe of a people in it's country, brings down complete towns, and is learning this degenerate behaviour to the general populus.
In a nutshel and generalized: most types of migration from MENA countries, drag down western countries and most people think it should be stopped. That's why Geert Wilders won and right wing politicians in many western countries will keep winning. It's really not that complicated, it's just a taboo in the press and within elite circles…