Jennifer Lopez’ endorsement of Kamala Harris unintentionally reveals the problems with modern political speeches and celebrity endorsements. What’s wrong with Lopez’ speech at Harris’ recent rally in Las Vegas? What does the speech reveal about so much of the rhetoric we hear from politicians and celebrities? Does this type of rhetoric ensure that people make informed decisions about which policies to support, or does it do the exact opposite? These are the questions this in-depth language analysis will answer by analyzing Lopez’ statements and comparing them to 1) reality and 2) statements Harris has made in speeches and interviews. The analysis uses concepts from political rhetoric.
Support the work this channel is doing:
This video has an educational purpose. You can use the principles and concepts to decode your own conversations.
As an analysis, this video is made according to the terms of ‘fair use’.
In her speech, Lopez talks about the election as “a choice between divided and united” and about what “anyone of decent character” should be offended by. However, are things as simple as Lopez presents them as? Are there contradictions?
source
@MNN-v3d
JFlow, fail in everything, her hubby don't want to be with her, no tour, and now this… never make one, 2024 is no Jello year, but is TRUMP yes!